Sep 09
22

Pro#039;s and con#039;s for police stun guns and patrol car video surveillance.?

View Comments

  

Pro's and con's for police stun guns and patrol car video surveillance.?

Tasers save more lives and injuries to both defendant and officer – persons with genetic defect or experiencing exited delirium can die.

Video there is no con – it is always for the better

>> Monitor Your Home Straight From Your Cell Phone – Download Manual

 Mail this post

Technorati Tags: ,

Tags: ,

This entry was posted on September 22, 2009 at 4:15 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Posted in General by admin View Comments

  • admin
    <div class="qa-container">
    <div class="content">The only con to the video surveillance is that many times cops can't kick the crap out of someone who needs it!</div></div>
  • admin
    <div class="qa-container">
    <div class="content">Stun guns/tasers: Less force needed. Better than a gun or baton.

    Video cams in cars: Tells the whole truth either way.

    I see no Cons for either.</div></div>
  • admin
    <div class="qa-container">
    <div class="content">Tazer-

    PRO- Non than lethal force when threatened.

    CON- You left it in the front seat..



    Video

    PRO- Has proven the officer to be in the right.

    CON- Has proven the officer to be in the wrong.</div></div>
  • admin
    <div class="qa-container">
    <div class="content">Used effectively and legally, there are no cons for tasers, except the risk of trama from falling to the ground, but that is a heck of alot better than being stuck with a baton. And there is almost never a con to video surveillance. It tells the whole story, un-bais</div></div>
blog comments powered by Disqus